Good Poems Make You Work?

April 24, 2007 on 2:53 am | In Poetry | No Comments

In the recent INTake article, I stated, “I think it’s partially because good poetry makes you work really hard.” I realize that, probably, my choice of the word “work” here was incorrect. Many people associate negative thoughts about “work” or at least not always stimulating and interesting thoughts about the activity to earn a keep.

I have attempted to come up with alternate words, but I run into a fairly long list (and many word combinations): Engage, provoke to thought, stimulate, etc. I think that the important  aspect I want to get to is that a poem engages the reader completely, relentlessly, and compellingly (and that last word is really assumed by the former two). A good poem does make you work by testing the aural space of sounds, by using metaphor to link two disparate ideas, by alluding to tradition (either outright rejection, incorporation, abandonment, utilization, or traditionally), by compelling the reader to consider his or her “place” in life. I’m using words I am certain many academics would frown upon, but poetry engages our deepest passions, fears, loves, and terrors. People want poetry read at their wedding, even if that is the only poem they have ever read. People want poetry read at their funeral, even when they won’t hear it. Poetry speaks to that center of human thought and desire that prose can only briefly touch, that music touches in a different manner, that painting can only briefly bring forth.

So I meant “work” in a sense that allows for entertainment, learning, feeling, etc. Poetry is the good work, the gumption normal people feel about planting some flowers in flowerbeds on the first warm days of spring. Every year they plant again and again. Some let weeds overtake and autumn is a relief. Some weed and till and work the beds all season long. Others plan to do so but only briefly foray out into the sun. Poetry is that first rush of excitement, the planning, the joy in placing hands into the dirt. Without it, we would not have such beautiful gardens, flowerbeds, or excitement. It is work, but it engages us wholly.

Henry James: A Quote

April 14, 2007 on 2:20 pm | In Uncategorized | No Comments

“We work in the dark - we do what we can - we give what we have. Our doubt is our passion, and our passion is our task. The rest is the madness of art.” - Henry James

INTake and National Poetry Month, Part II

April 12, 2007 on 11:09 pm | In Uncategorized | No Comments

The article featuring me along with several other Indiana poets hit the stands today. You can check out an online version at INTake’s site.

Neglected Masters

April 10, 2007 on 5:07 pm | In Poetry | No Comments

I recently received and begun reading Samuel Menashe’s New and Selected Poems from the Library of America. Menashe is the first recipient of Poetry Foundation’s Neglected Masters Award, of which the publication of this volume is part of the prize. I believe Menashe definitely is deserving of the prize (and Christopher Ricks’ introduction is very good at pointing out the poetics of Menashe’s genius). I will write at some future date about Menashe’s poems. Here, though, I would like to nominate my own poet for the next Neglected Masters Award. That poet is Jared Carter.

If you have never heard of Jared Carter or not read his poetry, you are missing out on some special writing. The reasons you may not have heard of him are all too common, alas. First, he lives in Indiana and often his writing uses regional folklore, history, and landscapes. However, all writing is, in the end, regional. All writing is colored by the context of the writer and wherever he or she is. To dismiss outright a Midwest writer simply because he or she does not hail from the Northeast is not only wrong but also results in a poorer literature. The second reason is that many of Carter’s poems are in the narrative mode. Sadly, the narrative poem is often viewed with hostility at the worst, disdain at the least. Let me clarify this a bit, though. These two reasons are why Carter is not known or discussed in academic circles. Carter’s poetry is formalist, narrative, accessible, and regional. While the academy may find this kind of poetry off limits, general readers find his work compelling, real, entertaining, and—horrors—beautiful. (If I am sounding too much like Dana Gioia here, apologies, but I often find myself in agreement with his evaluation of the poetry world in academics, the general populace, and the value and role poetry have.)

Carter has had more recognition in his life than Menashe, but more does not mean adequate. Carter has published several books and was invited to read at the Library of Congress by Ted Kooser (then Poet Laureate). Still, finding Carter’s works in a bookstore is difficult and his prominence is far too slight for a poet of such imaginative depth and compelling language.

To help understand the significance of Carter’s work, I would like to discuss a single poem of his from his first widely published book, Work, for the Night Is Coming, which won the 1980 Walt Whitman Award from the Academy of American Poets (I seem to recall that it was not called the Walt Whitman Award at that time). The poem is “Early Warning” and is quoted in full below:

Early Warning

When the weather turned
Crows settled about the house
Cawing daylong among the new leaves.
It would be a hard spring,
Folks said, the crows—
They know. There are folks
Up near where I come from
In Mississinewa County
Who study such things.
Folks who believe tornadoes
Are alive: that polluted streams
Rise from their beds
Like lepers, following after
Some great churning, twisting cloud.
With their own eyes
They’ve seen a cyclone stop,
Lap up electricity
From a substation, then make
A right-angle turn
And peel the roof off some
Prefabricated egg factory.
Thousands of hens, who’ve never seen
The light of the sun, or
Touched earth with their beaks,
Go up the funnel like souls to God.

I am not going to spend a great deal of time explicating this poem. I think its power, originality, and beauty (there’s that word again) are in many ways self-evident. Carter is accessible, but accessibility does not mean his work lacks depth, precision, or weight.

I think this poem makes particularly strong use of enjambments, of giving a line a “meaning” and then altering that “meaning” or expectation of meaning by the following line: “Folks said, the crows—/They know.” The first line of this enjambment sets up an expectation that people, with their abundant natural lore, find some foreknowing in the crows’ actions (the analogous item is when people say that dogs know when an earthquake is coming before the earthquake comes). The second line of the enjambment fulfills that expectation. Yet, the dash alters the normal expectation. The dash forces a longer pause then a normal enjambed line would have placed on the reader. That pause provides a telling, a decisive altering in the meaning. We move from a common statement of natural lore to a mysterious, spooky prophecy. “They know” because of that dash hints at a more elusive knowledge than simple instinct.

Another important bit of work going on in this poem is the narrative. The story begins with crows and end with eggs becoming victim to the tornado. Getting from that beginning to that end is unexpected, but it works because Carter takes us there. He diverges from the simplicity of crows attempting to escape the storm, to crows foretelling the storm (and, in fact, do they foretell more than the storm, but the hens being called back to God?), to folklore of tornados being alive, to the destruction of an egg factory. Carter makes the end seem inevitable by the way he moves through the images and lines.

I will stop here, but I hope you can recognize some of joy of reading this poem and will investigate more of Carter’s work. He is a neglected master by academics and critics. He is a master of evoking his region to reveal universal (ah, another of those words) significance. All writing is regional. Great writing is regional and universal at the same time.

The Coast of Utopia: A Comment on Poetry

April 5, 2007 on 10:11 pm | In Uncategorized, Poetry | No Comments

From Tom Stoppard’s The Coast of Utopia: Part I, Voyage. Vissarion Belinsky, a literary critic is speaking:

“A poem can’t be written by an act of will. When the rest of us are trying our hardest to be present, a real poet goes absent. We can watch him in the moment of creation, there he sits with the pen in his hand, not moving. When it moves, we’ve missed it. Where did he go in that moment? The meaning of art lies in the answer to that question.”

INTake and National Poetry Month

April 2, 2007 on 3:37 am | In Uncategorized, Poetry | No Comments

I was contacted recently by Matt Gonzales at INTake for an interview for National Poetry Month. I was to be included in a piece featuring several poets from the Indianapolis region under 40 and “musing” on the place of poetry in the 21st century. Joe Vitti, a photographer, came to my home on Friday to take some pictures for the piece.

I cannot remember all that I said, other than I am sure I will be less than happy with how I sound. I probably made little to no sense and placed myself in an overly traditional position, which is not how I would like to be seen. It so happens that I was reading Dana Gioia’s book Disappearing Ink: Poetry at the End of Print Culture. In the title essay, Gioia made some interesting comments that tied into mine that I made to INTake:

“According to a 1999 survey, at that time the average American child lived in a household that owned two television sets, three tape recorders, three radios, two videocassette recorders, two compact disc players, one videogame player, and a computer. The survey neglected to mention of the home had any books, but it did note that the child spent five hours and forty-eight minutes each day with electronic media versus forty-four minutes with print. It should be noted that the time the child spent with print includes that complusory activity called homework.”

Now I don’t want to champion print over new media, and that may be the fault in Gioia’s quoted numbers: How much of the 5:48 was spent reading materials. What I won’t suggest, however, is that more or even half of it was spent reading versus watching TV or playing games. My intention by quoting this is to indicate how little time is spent really reading something–whether it be poems, fiction, or the paper. Anything. The electronic age is upon us–was a few years ago–and I do not and would not contemplate reversing it. But can we slow down ourselves a tad bit. Take a moment to read a poem. Just because it requires a bit of work should not mean we should avoid it. I believe in art, and I specifically believe in poetry as necessary.

I am no radical traditionalist. In fact, I plan on having a small ebook available for sale from my website soon. New media provides new and interesting possibilities for expansion of the art. I simply do not want us not spending the time to engage with it simply because it requires some time and effort. Poetry is not dead or dying, but will readers give it a chance? Will poets provide readers with the chance?

Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^